{"id":2555,"date":"2024-03-25T17:10:33","date_gmt":"2024-03-25T17:10:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/dpetkovski\/?p=2555"},"modified":"2024-07-21T10:10:54","modified_gmt":"2024-07-21T10:10:54","slug":"replicating-vwce-optimize-for-cost-and-performance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/localhost\/dpetkovski\/replicating-vwce-optimize-for-cost-and-performance\/","title":{"rendered":"Replicating VWCE – Optimize for Cost and Performance"},"content":{"rendered":"

VWCE won the hearts of many European investors and became the go-to ETF for a one-fund portfolio.<\/p>\n

I can see the appeal of that.<\/p>\n

You buy a single ETF and you’re done – no need to\u00a0rebalance<\/a>, no need to worry about\u00a0asset allocation<\/a>, etc.<\/p>\n

However, there is another parameter that many investors seem to ignore: the total expense ratio<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In this post, I’ll describe why VWCE might not be optimal for many investors and I’ll provide alternatives.<\/p>\n

But first of all: what is VWCE?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\n